🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, the former US president gave the impression to take a firm stance regarding the Ukrainian conflict. After delivering statements of "serious ramifications" in August in case Putin continued hindering truce discussions, Trump finally enacted major sanctions on Russia's primary energy firms, Rosneft and Lukoil. This decision substantially hindered the Russian leader's capability to support his military invasion in the region.

However, through his recently unveiled detailed peace plan for Ukraine, reportedly developed by US and Russian diplomats excluding Ukrainian or EU involvement, the former president has apparently returned to his favorable to Russia position.

Favoring Aggression

The former president's proposal would essentially reward the Russian leader for attacking a sovereign nation while leaving Ukraine's democratic system in peril. Although ringing proclamations that "The nation's sovereignty will be affirmed", much of the proposal effectively weaken that very autonomy. What represents a Kremlin dream would certainly be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Demonstrating his real-estate experience, the former president persists to consider the war as a mere border issue, as if handing Putin a section of Ukraine's territory will appease the leader. But, Putin's invasion is not simply about occupying a charred region of industrial-devastated area in Ukraine's east. It is about the nation's democratic governance – and the Russian leader's apparent desire to destroy it so it stops acts as an attractive example for the Russian people of the responsible governance that his growing autocracy withholds them.

Land Concessions

While keeping in status the presently divided regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's initiative would force the nation to abandon the entire this eastern territory. Aside from benefiting the Russian Federation with territory that its troops have been unsuccessful to capture in more than a ten years of fighting, this surrender would make Ukraine's defenses severely compromised.

The area is the site of the nation's well-known "fortress belt", the fortified military defenses that constitute a essential obstacle to Russian advances. The proposal would have the Ukrainian military surrender these positions, leaving Putin a unobstructed route to Kyiv in case he eventually decide to restart the war.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Then, in a move that would make additional conflict easier for the Russian military, the plan would require the nation to reduce the scale of its troops from their present approximately 800,000 soldiers to a maximum of six hundred thousand. Significantly, Trump's plan sets no such restrictions on Russian forces.

Apparently as a gesture to Russia's attempts to characterize the nation's chosen by the people leadership as extremists, Trump's proposal declares: "Any extremist doctrine and actions must be opposed and banned." Apparently to emphasize this aspect, it requires that "The nation will hold political contests in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. However, the proposal places no condition that the Russian leader jeopardize his regime by allowing elections in his own country.

Security Commitments

Admittedly, the proposal makes Russia promise not to "invade other states" and to "establish in law its stance of non-aggression towards Europe and Ukraine". Yet taking into account that Putin has breached equivalent agreements in the past – such as the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government committed to respect the nation's territorial integrity in return for giving up its Soviet-era atomic arms, and the previous peace deals, in which Russia promised to a halt in fighting and a restoration of occupied land in eastern Ukraine to Kyiv – why should anyone have confidence in this commitment on this occasion?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on international protection assurances. Although the plan promises a "immediate coordinated military response" should Russia resume its military campaign, and provides that "Ukraine will receive dependable protection assurances", the details range from fuzzy to concerning. The proposal would not only prevent the nation Nato membership but also preclude alliance nations from stationing troops on Ukrainian territory, effectively preventing the reassurance force, likely commanded by the UK and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been relying to prevent Russia from restoring his reduced forces, rearming, and reinvading.

Global Concern

A separate side agreement apparently would grant the nation with a similar to NATO defense commitment, in which any later "major, planned, and ongoing military assault" by Russia on the country "will be treated as an attack threatening the stability and safety of the allied countries." This indicates a armed reaction. Yet unlike a strong national defense – the nation's primary deterrent against renewed hostilities – the success of the parallel accord would rely on the commitment of Nato leaders, such as the US administration, to react with force to Putin's hostilities, something they have {not